skip to content
Jack Riordan

Jack Riordan


T (864) 751-7638
F (864) 751-7800

A member of the firm's Litigation and Transportation practice groups, Jack has a varied practice representing the interests of independent business entities, individuals, insurance companies and their policyholders.

Jack's practice encompasses civil and criminal litigation; primarily defense, but plaintiff matters as well. Having tried well over 100 cases before juries as "First Chair," Jack has a wealth of front-line litigation experience throughout the State and Federal Courts of South Carolina. Jack began his legal career as an Assistant Solicitor for the Fifth Judicial Circuit (Violent Crime Task Force), before serving with both the Capital Litigation Section (Death Penalty) and the State Wide Grand Jury Division of the S.C Attorney General's Office (Multi-County Drug and Public Corruption cases). Accordingly, Jack maintains membership with the Greenville Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (GACDL) and defends select Criminal matters, including defense of White Collar Crime and/or Securities allegations. Discretion is always a priority. However, in relation to some criminal matters, Jack has initiated effective §1983 actions to combat government infringement of Constitutional Rights by State and Municipal officials.

Jack has provided oral argument in nine cases before the S.C. Supreme Court and at least once in five cases before the S.C. Court of Appeals.

Jack has just completed his second three-year term on the Executive Committee of the South Carolina Defense Trial Attorneys' Association; he was Chairman of the 2016 Summer Meeting, Chairman of the 2015 Trial Academy and has assisted in training young attorneys across S.C. through the Academy several times in past years. Jack previously chaired the Trucking Substantive Law Committee for its initial three years of existence.

Jack is the married father of three and spends much leisure time attending their various athletic endeavors or abusing his own body in age inappropriate sports and activities (playing basketball, attending his wife Leora's spinning or TRX classes; biking, sprint triathlons, mud runs or similar "races"). Jack’s son is a Computer Engineering major at Clemson and a member of the Swim Club. Jack’s oldest daughter is Biology major at the University of Tennessee and is a member of the Volunteer Track and Cross-Country Teams. Jack’s youngest daughter attends Wade Hampton High School, lettering in swimming and as a multiple State Finalist for the Cross-Country Team.

  • Selected by his peers as Greenville Best Lawyers Personal Injury Litigation Lawyer of the Year (Copyright 2011 by Woodward/White, Inc., of Aiken, S.C.), 2012
  • Listed, The Best Lawyers in America® (Woodward/White, Inc.), Personal Injury Litigation (2012-2018)
  • Martindale-Hubbell's top ("AV") Peer Review Rating
  • Greenville Business Magazine's Legal Elite, Commercial Transportation (2012), Criminal (2014-2017)
  • Greenville's Best and Brightest Under 35, 2002
  • Leadership Greenville-Class XXIX

* CV, BV, and AV are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedure's standards and policies.


Representative Work

  • A near majority of cases assist the firm's Transportation Practice Group in defending trucking companies and their drivers in litigated matters.
  • Litigated environmental claims on behalf of citizen Plaintiffs with regard to at least one significant "toxic tort" (PCB) suit initiated against a multi-state utility. Presently involved in representation of victims of a Carbon Monoxide event at a hotel in Boone, NC.
  • Defends nursing homes, home health providers and other medical professionals with regard to medical negligence allegations.
  • Defends premises liability claims against Corporate Entities and product liability allegations against various equipment manufacturers.
  • Jack's seasoned representation has encompassed thousands of diverse matters and will continue to reflect the constant pursuit of justice on behalf of his clients.

Reported Cases:

  • Hueble v SCDNR and Eric Randall Vaughn; S.C. Supreme Court; Op. No. 27631 (April 27, 2016)
  • Stringer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 386 S.C. 188, 687 S.E.2d 58 (Ct. App. En Banc 2009)
  • Underwood v. Copenen 367 S.C. 214; 625 S.E. 2d 236 (Ct. App. 2006)
  • Dorothy L. Sides and Arthur L. Sides v. Greenville Hospital System, Rodgers Builders Inc. and F.T. Williams Co., Inc. 362 S.C.250; 607 S.E.2d 362 (Ct. App. 2004)
  • Lydia v. Horton, 355 S.C. 36, 583 S.E.2d 750 (2003)
  • Lydia v. Horton, 343 S.C. 376, 540 S.E.2d 102, (Ct. App. 2000)
  • State v. Hammitt, 341 S.C. 638, 535 S.E.2d 459 (Ct. App. 2000)
  • State v. Vasquez, 341 S.C. 648, 535 S.E.2d 465 (Ct. App. 2000)
  • State v. Harris, 342 S.C. 191, 535 S.E.2d 652 (Ct. App. 2000)
  • State V. Avery, 333 S.C. 284, 509 S.E.2d 476 (1999)
  • State v. Taylor, 333 S.C. 159, 508 S.E.2d 870 (1999)
  • State v. Collins, 329 S.C. 23, 495 S.E.2d 202 (1998)
  • State v. Weston, 329 S.C. 287, 494 S.E.2d 801 (1997)
  • State v. Timmons, 327 S.C. 48, 488 S.E.2d 323 (1997)

* Past success does not indicate the likelihood of success in any future legal representation.



  • Clemson University, B.S., Financial Management, 1989
  • University of South Carolina School of Law, J.D., 1992
  • South Carolina
  • United States District Court, District of South Carolina
  • American Bar Association
  • South Carolina Bar Association
  • South Carolina Defense Trial Attorneys' Association
  • Greenville Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
  • Greenville County Bar Association

Each of our lawyer's e-mail address is provided with his or her biography. If you are not a current client of our firm, you should not e-mail our lawyers with any confidential information or any information about a specific legal matter, given that our firm may presently represent persons or companies who have interests that are adverse to you. If you are not a current client and you e-mail any lawyer in our firm, you do so without any expectation of confidentiality. We will not establish a professional relationship with you via e-mail. Instead, you should contact our firm by telephone so that we can determine whether we are in a position to consult with you about any legal matters before you share any confidential or sensitive information with us.