skip to content
Converted Life Insurance Policy Remains Subject to ERISA; State Law Claims Preempted

Converted Life Insurance Policy Remains Subject to ERISA; State Law Claims Preempted

Woods v. Am. United Life Ins. Co., 2015 WL 7075284 (N.D. Ala. Nov. 13, 2015)


ERISA and Life Insurance News
(April, 2016)

Woods, the beneficiary of her mother's life insurance policy, alleged that American United wrongfully denied her claim for a death benefit and then, after acknowledging that benefits should have been paid, misrepresented the amount of the benefit in an effort to get her to sign a release.

She filed suit, asserting state law claims for breach of contract; fraud; suppression/concealment; bad faith; deceit; and negligent screening, hiring, training, and supervision. She sought to recover compensatory and punitive damages and requested a trial by jury on her claims.

First, Woods alleged that her mother's coverage, although originally issued as part of an ERISA plan, was converted to an individual or personal plan upon her mother's retirement and that her mother's continuation policy was not subject to ERISA. The court found this argument without merit and turned to the issue of preemption.

The court held that Woods's claims for fraud, suppression/concealment, and deceit all related to the existence and amount of her mother's life insurance coverage under an ERISA plan, as did Woods's rights as a beneficiary of the plan. Her claims were based on the core allegations that American United misrepresented that no insurance benefit was payable because her mother had not continued her coverage under the group policy, concealed the existence of documents showing that her mother had increased her coverage and had continued the coverage after retirement, and misrepresented the amount of her mother's continuation coverage.

The court held that the misrepresentations and omissions alleged in the complaint related directly to the ERISA plan. Because the fraud, suppression/concealment, and deceit claims all related to the plan, and because Woods conceded that her other state law claims were preempted if ERISA applied, all of her claims were preempted and dismissed. The court allowed Woods two weeks to amend her complaint to plead claims under ERISA.

Click here to view the full April 2016 Edition of the ERISA and Life Insurance News.

Authors
H. Sanders Carter
T (404) 962-1015
F (404) 962-1220
Andrea K. Cataland
T (404) 962-1045
F (404) 962-1255
Kenton J. Coppage
T (404) 962-1065
F (404) 962-1256
Dorothy H. Cornwell
T (404) 962-1096
F (404) 962-1246
Mary B. Ramsay
T (843) 300-6659
F (843) 300-6759
Jennifer Noland Rathman
T (404) 962-1074
F (404) 962-1213
DISCLAIMER

Each of our lawyer's e-mail address is provided with his or her biography. If you are not a current client of our firm, you should not e-mail our lawyers with any confidential information or any information about a specific legal matter, given that our firm may presently represent persons or companies who have interests that are adverse to you. If you are not a current client and you e-mail any lawyer in our firm, you do so without any expectation of confidentiality. We will not establish a professional relationship with you via e-mail. Instead, you should contact our firm by telephone so that we can determine whether we are in a position to consult with you about any legal matters before you share any confidential or sensitive information with us.