skip to content
Retaliation: Scratches From The Cat

Retaliation: Scratches From The Cat's Paw


The Inside Perspective
(May 17, 2011)

One protection against a retaliation claim is to shield an "accused" supervisor from subsequent decisions about the employee who has complained. Doing so helps to avoid what courts call the "cat's paw" theory of liability.

The term comes from a fable about a monkey that convinces a cat to use its paw to dig chestnuts out of a fire. The monkey avoided injury by setting up the cat to do its dirty work and accomplish its desired outcome. In litigation, courts ask whether the supervisor with the retaliatory motive (the "monkey") has similarly acted behind the scenes to manipulate another manager (the "cat") to discipline or even fire the employee who accused him or her of wrongdoing.

What steps can a careful employer take when it is not feasible to remove the accused supervisor from ongoing management of the accusing employee?

  • Establish a second source of input for information needed by decision-makers. That is, even if the accused supervisor must stay involved, provide a "second opinion" as back-up.
  • Be careful to document the fact that decisions are based on the views or opinions of multiple managers, not only those of the accused supervisor.
  • Take opportunities to share certain supervisory duties. For example, if the employee engages in misconduct, bring in an outside manager to conduct the investigation.
  • As always, try to make discharge decisions based on objective and verifiable factors, not on the subjective judgments of the accused supervisor
  • Be sure to act in accordance with written policies that are equally applied to all employees. Now is not the time to vary your actions from the language of your policy.

TIP:  There has been a dramatic increase in the number of retaliation claims. Even when an underlying discrimination claim lacks merit, later disciplinary action or discharge can give rise to a retaliation claim. Therefore, management of "complainants" requires careful thought, especially when an adverse personnel decision is on the horizon.

Authors
Alexander L. Maultsby
T (336) 378-5331
F (336) 378-5400
Associated Attorneys
DISCLAIMER

Each of our lawyer's e-mail address is provided with his or her biography. If you are not a current client of our firm, you should not e-mail our lawyers with any confidential information or any information about a specific legal matter, given that our firm may presently represent persons or companies who have interests that are adverse to you. If you are not a current client and you e-mail any lawyer in our firm, you do so without any expectation of confidentiality. We will not establish a professional relationship with you via e-mail. Instead, you should contact our firm by telephone so that we can determine whether we are in a position to consult with you about any legal matters before you share any confidential or sensitive information with us.